<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Hell is Public Relations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/</link>
	<description>Less Confusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skywalker</title>
		<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Skywalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moorethink.com/?p=390#comment-679</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about the relationship ... but you know this already. No matter how interesting or boring your pitch and associated story angle, if you have an established relationship with a reporter/editor, chances increase exponentially that they&#039;ll at least read your email and probably reply. No relationship in place, and a mass email to 300 reporters will almost always yield the same results -- little to no response. 

I tend to believe reporters more today than I did several years ago with their &quot;i&#039;m too busy claims.&quot; Reduced staff = increased beat coverage. Social media = more channels for which they have to provide content. A print reporter back in the day only had to meet deadline with a single story. That&#039;s not busy. Reporters today have to write their story for print, then blog about it, then make sure their twitter feed is updated, then upload a video to YouTube, then record a podcast, etc. etc. Today&#039;s reporters certainly have more of an argument that they&#039;re spread a little thin. They&#039;re busy feeding the machines that perpetuate our ADD culture. 

I&#039;ve also found, however, that when a reporter has more content channels to fill, your chances increase that they&#039;ll be interested in your &quot;news.&quot; Very likely that they won&#039;t write an all out article about your topic, but they may be interested in including a mention in their blog, etc. In this sense, one could argue that today&#039;s media model presents more of an opportunity for PR folks. 

Last observation -- Email is still the killer app. Any reporter who claims &quot;i&#039;d rather just receive pitches via Twitter&quot; is just trying to protect their inbox and reduce the number of pitches they get. You think breaking through the noise via email is difficult, try getting noticed in some stranger&#039;s twitter feed. Gimme a break. 

Skywalker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the relationship &#8230; but you know this already. No matter how interesting or boring your pitch and associated story angle, if you have an established relationship with a reporter/editor, chances increase exponentially that they&#8217;ll at least read your email and probably reply. No relationship in place, and a mass email to 300 reporters will almost always yield the same results &#8212; little to no response. </p>
<p>I tend to believe reporters more today than I did several years ago with their &#8220;i&#8217;m too busy claims.&#8221; Reduced staff = increased beat coverage. Social media = more channels for which they have to provide content. A print reporter back in the day only had to meet deadline with a single story. That&#8217;s not busy. Reporters today have to write their story for print, then blog about it, then make sure their twitter feed is updated, then upload a video to YouTube, then record a podcast, etc. etc. Today&#8217;s reporters certainly have more of an argument that they&#8217;re spread a little thin. They&#8217;re busy feeding the machines that perpetuate our ADD culture. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found, however, that when a reporter has more content channels to fill, your chances increase that they&#8217;ll be interested in your &#8220;news.&#8221; Very likely that they won&#8217;t write an all out article about your topic, but they may be interested in including a mention in their blog, etc. In this sense, one could argue that today&#8217;s media model presents more of an opportunity for PR folks. </p>
<p>Last observation &#8212; Email is still the killer app. Any reporter who claims &#8220;i&#8217;d rather just receive pitches via Twitter&#8221; is just trying to protect their inbox and reduce the number of pitches they get. You think breaking through the noise via email is difficult, try getting noticed in some stranger&#8217;s twitter feed. Gimme a break. </p>
<p>Skywalker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Vest</title>
		<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Vest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moorethink.com/?p=390#comment-677</guid>
		<description>I agree with every thing you say but think you&#039;re making this too hard --PR -communications -Public Affairs -was and always will be writing - shapping - telling your client&#039;s story.  On any given day there are going to be more interesting stories --The Kent Hance Senate campaign is short one camera crew in Beaumont because of a drowning in the bay.

Your description of problems in the legacy media are right but you left one out --the declining news hole --fewer reporters doing more with less space 

--except on line and in broadcast.  

PEW found that as more consumers migrate to the Internet Local TV is still the most popular source of news in America (51%) (Remember Omaha in the 80s?  Small appliaacnes what about &#039;em?)

--So remodel your pitch for the locals --I have to believe Medcaid rip offs will find a nice home there --of course your pitch may have to be a little hyperactive --screaming tag lines and all --but they can find some local bad guys--right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with every thing you say but think you&#8217;re making this too hard &#8211;PR -communications -Public Affairs -was and always will be writing &#8211; shapping &#8211; telling your client&#8217;s story.  On any given day there are going to be more interesting stories &#8211;The Kent Hance Senate campaign is short one camera crew in Beaumont because of a drowning in the bay.</p>
<p>Your description of problems in the legacy media are right but you left one out &#8211;the declining news hole &#8211;fewer reporters doing more with less space </p>
<p>&#8211;except on line and in broadcast.  </p>
<p>PEW found that as more consumers migrate to the Internet Local TV is still the most popular source of news in America (51%) (Remember Omaha in the 80s?  Small appliaacnes what about &#8216;em?)</p>
<p>&#8211;So remodel your pitch for the locals &#8211;I have to believe Medcaid rip offs will find a nice home there &#8211;of course your pitch may have to be a little hyperactive &#8211;screaming tag lines and all &#8211;but they can find some local bad guys&#8211;right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moorethink.com/?p=390#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I agree completely, Ross.  I never wanted people wasting my time, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely, Ross.  I never wanted people wasting my time, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moorethink.com/?p=390#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Having been both a biz and a political reporter, I can tell you that one problem with many PR folks is that they give the same weight to their good and bad pitches. There&#039;s often no difference between, &quot;Hey look, this is right up your alley,&quot; and &quot;Hey look, I have a client who needs to be in your publication.&quot; The best flacks are the ones who sort these things out and don&#039;t waste a reporter/editor&#039;s time. They suffer for what the bad flacks do to those same journalists....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been both a biz and a political reporter, I can tell you that one problem with many PR folks is that they give the same weight to their good and bad pitches. There&#8217;s often no difference between, &#8220;Hey look, this is right up your alley,&#8221; and &#8220;Hey look, I have a client who needs to be in your publication.&#8221; The best flacks are the ones who sort these things out and don&#8217;t waste a reporter/editor&#8217;s time. They suffer for what the bad flacks do to those same journalists&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.moorethink.com/2009/07/13/what-the-hell-is-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moorethink.com/?p=390#comment-672</guid>
		<description>As another person with a particular interest in a company, I think reporters are being increasingly &quot;disintermediated&quot; by the people&#039;s media.

The &quot;United Breaks Guitars&quot; (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_X-Qoh__mw) is a very current example. Would have made a great story. But too late for old media.

In the end, like industry analysts, I just don&#039;t think it matters that much and it looks like you made the right career move 10 years ago.

And not to put a stick to it but it&#039;s &quot;PR&quot;; not Reporter Relations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another person with a particular interest in a company, I think reporters are being increasingly &#8220;disintermediated&#8221; by the people&#8217;s media.</p>
<p>The &#8220;United Breaks Guitars&#8221; (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_X-Qoh__mw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_X-Qoh__mw</a>) is a very current example. Would have made a great story. But too late for old media.</p>
<p>In the end, like industry analysts, I just don&#8217;t think it matters that much and it looks like you made the right career move 10 years ago.</p>
<p>And not to put a stick to it but it&#8217;s &#8220;PR&#8221;; not Reporter Relations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

